CRWP-5847 IN THE (174) MUKSAN AN STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o the official res petitioners at their represent 2. submitted tha 15.05.2026 be 4) raising thei same has not y 5847-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CR Da AN AND ANOTHER Versus
OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Prabhjot Singh Mann, Advoc Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ****
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fil tion of India seeking issuance of a w ial respondents No.2 and 3 to protec rs at the hands of respondents No. resentation dated 15.05.2026 (Annexu At the very outset, learned coun d that the petitioners have recently 26 before the Superintendent of Polic g their grievances as mentioned in t s not yet been considered and no action JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRWP-5847-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.05.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA
Advocate for the petitioners nior DAG, Punjab een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing protect the life and liberty of the No.4 to 7 and to take action on nnexure P-4). d counsel for the petitioners has cently filed a representation on f Police, Malerkotla (Annexure P- ed in the present petition but the action has been taken thereon. AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.18 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5847 He further sub appropriate di Police, Malerk petitioners and 3. 4. notice on beha be done in due her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid rep petitioners wit order in accord petitioners, the in order to pro
18.05.2026 Amit Sharma 5847-2026 (O&M) (2) er submitted that at this stage, the peti iate directions are issued to responde Malerkotla to decide the aforesaid rs and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D n behalf of the respondents-State and s in due course. Let a complete set of th ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer mad ting anything on the merits of the c of at this stage with a direction to res d representation dated 15.05.2026 rs within a period of 15 days from to accordance with law. Needless to say, rs, the official respondents would pro to protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:
   he petitioners would be satisfied if spondent No.2-Superintendent of esaid representation filed by the reon. Sr. DAG, Punjab, has advance e and submits that the needful will et of the paperbook be supplied to r made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-4) of the rom today, by passing a speaking to say, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE ned:- Yes/No

AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.18 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.