Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20367 (AP)

M/ s.Vishnu Sri Agro Industries private Limited v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/12408/2022 · 2026-02-15

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010210562022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 12408/2022 Between: 1. M/ S.VISHNU SRI AGRO INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, ALAMURU VILLAGE, PENUMANTRA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED, REP.BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE JOINT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT CIVIL SUPPLIED OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not allotting the paddy to the petitioner's rice mills for Custom Milling despite the application dated 30.3.2022 made by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles natural justice besides violation of Article 14 of the 2 Constitution of India and to consequentlydirect the respondents to allot the regular quantity to its capacity for Custom Milling of paddy and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to consider the application dated 30.3.2022 made by the petitionerby supplying Paddy for Custom Milling to it forthwith pending disposal of the writ petition. IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order dated 04 05-22 in WA. 12408/2022 by dismissing the above writ petition, and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P HEMA CHANDRA (SC FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES CORP LTD) The Court made the following: 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri G.Saideep, learned counsel representing Sri V.V.Satish, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 16.02.2026. JLV 4 25 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 12408/2022 Date: 16.02.2026 JLV