[2026:RJ-JP:1760] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3187/2025 Pintu Meena S/o Jairam, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Dhani Dheharwala Sanjay Nagar, Police Station Khetri District Jhunjhunu Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail Sikar) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Anchi Devi W/o Late Shri Sher Singh, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Nayabas, P.s. Neem Ka Thana Kotwali District Sikar (Raj.). ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Govind Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 15/01/2026 1. This criminal appeal has been filed by the accused-appellant u/S 14 SC/ST Prevention from Atrocities Act, 1989, assailing the order dated 25.11.2025 passed by the Court Learned Special Judge, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Sikar (Raj.), in Criminal Misc. (Bail)(C.I.S.) No. 845/2025 filed by the appellant under Section 483 BNSS in connection with the FIR No. 126/2020 registered at police station Neem Ka Thana (Sikar), District Sikar for offence u/S 458, 323, 143 and 365 of IPC and u/S 3(2)(v) and 3(2)(Va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, whereby the bail application was dismissed. 2. Heard. [2026:RJ-JP:1760] (2 of 2) [CRLAS-3187/2025] 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. 4. The accused-appellant along with other nine co-accused persons have been charge-sheeted. During proceedings of trial, accused-appellant remained absent on 14.06.2022, and his bail bonds were forfeited and arrest warrant was issued against him. In view of the arrest warrant, accused-appellant was arrested on 13.10.2025. 5. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the trial of the co-accused have been completed and they all have been convicted. The trial of the accused-appellant could not be concluded as he is absconding since 14.06.2022. 6. Taking into consideration the fact that the accused-appellant did not appear before the Trial Court because of which the trial of the accused-appellant could not be concluded and so also the fact that other co-accused have already been convicted by the Trial Court, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present criminal appeal. 7. Accordingly, this criminal appeal is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /297