Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20364 (KAR)

M/S UNIQ DETECTIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SRI C BALAKRISHNA

RFA/1908/2024 · 2026-06-08

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27567 RFA No. 1908 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1908 OF 2024 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. M/S UNIQ DETECTIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED NO.81/A, 2ND CROSS, GKW LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU-560 040. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED PERSON MR. ALOYSIUS MASCARENHAS 2. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (HUMAN RESOURCES) M/S UNIQ DETECTIVE AND SECURITY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, NO.81/A, 2ND CROSS, GKW LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 040 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. PRASHANTH B.K..,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI C BALAKRISHNA S/O LATE CHINARAJU., Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27567 RFA No. 1908 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.280/1, NEW MICO-CENTRAL JAIL ROAD, G.K.LAYOUT, PARAPPANA AGRAHARA, BANGALORE - 560 100. 2. M/S. BOSCH LIMITED, NAGANATHAPURA PLANT POST BOX NO.6887 ELECTRONICS CIY POST, BENGALURU, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER(HR) …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MAITREYI KRISHNAN.,ADVOCATE; SRI. J. PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29.06.2024 PASSED IN OS.NO.6190/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE XV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27567 RFA No. 1908 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 filed a memo stating that the matter is settled. Hence, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has no objection to dismiss the appeal as having become infructuous. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous as it is settled out of the court. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE AG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48