Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20361 (KAR)

SRI. B. NARAYANA, v. SRI. PARAMASHIVAIAH

CRL.RP/1068/2024 · 2026-06-10

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28226 CRL.RP No. 1068 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1068 OF 2024 (397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. B. NARAYANA, S/O. LATE BANGARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.478, GIRIDARSHINI LAYOUT, ALANAHALLI POST, MYSURU-570 028. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHESH NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. PARAMASHIVAIAH S/O. T. D. THAMMAIAHSHETTY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.80, D BLOCK, 3RD CROSS, S.B.M. COLONY,BOGADI, MYSURU-570 026. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MOHAN B.K, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28226 CRL.RP No. 1068 of 2024 PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY THE HONBLE VI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SPECIAL JUDGE, MYSURU DTD 20.03.2024 IN CRL.A.NO.193/2023, BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER IN CC.NO.381/2015 ON THE FILE OF HONBLE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MYSURU DTD 17.01.2023, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed an application to recall the order dated 11.11.2024. 2. It is noticed that on 11.11.2024, this Court has passed the order that the revision petitioner has not complied with the interim order even though it was extended once. Now, the application is filed to modify the order dated 11.11.2024. Once, the sentence is suspended conditionally and the same is not complied with even though order was passed on 04.09.2024. When the revision petitioner has not complied with the order for nearly years, the question of considering this revision - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28226 CRL.RP No. 1068 of 2024 petition does not arise. Moreover, the revision petition is not admitted and only the sentence is suspended conditionally and the same is not complied with. Accordingly, the criminal revision petition stands dismissed in view of non-compliance of the said conditional order. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2