Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.5753 of 2026
1. Sameer Jena
2. Saroj Kumar Jena
3. Sasmita Jena
…. Petitioners
Mr. S.K. Baral, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Ms. B.L. Tripathy, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
ORDER 09.06.2026
01.
1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.T. Case No.396 of 2026 pending on the file of learned S.D.J.M., Athagarh, arising out of Khuntuni P.S. Case No.121 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 140(3) of BNS.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that it is a case of false implication that the alleged victim left her home out of her own volition. Hence, the Petitioner No.1 and other p. 2 Petitioners have been implicated only because relationship with the Petitioner No.1.
4. Though Such submission is opposed by the
learned counsel for the State. With all fairness, on the basis of the statement recorded under section 183 of the BNSS, she submits that it is borne out from the said statement that the victim had left out of her own volition.
5. Considering such submission, it is directed that in the event of arrest of the Petitioners in connection with the aforesaid case, they shall be released on bail by the Arresting Officer on such terms and conditions deemed just and proper with further conditions that they will cooperate with the investigation.
6. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. U.C.C. as per rules.
(V. NARASINGH)
Vacation Judge
Soumya