2026:CGHC:22164 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2363 of 2026 1 - Khamhan Singh S/o Late Chain Singh Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Beltikri, Post Secl, Gevra Project Tehsil Dipka District Korba C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Head Office Seepat Road Bilaspur District Bilaspur C.G. 2 - General Manager South Eastern Coalfied Limited Dipka Area, Hr, Department Post Pragati Nagar District Korba C.G. 3 - General Manager Secl Gevra Area, District Korba C.G. 4 - Area Karmik Manager, Secl Dipka Area, District Korba C.G. 5 - Sub Divisional Office (Revenue ) Katghora District Korba C.G. 6 - Tahsildar Dipka District Korab C.G. 7 - Jagmohan Singh Son Of Pawan Singh Posted At Gevra Project Backup Section As Foremen Dipka District Korba C.G. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 8 - Raghuveer Singh Rajpur S/o Bhagwat Singh Posted At Central Excavation Workshop Gevra Tehsil Dipka District Korba C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Chandra, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer. For Respondents No. 1 to 4 : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Bajpai, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 12/05/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to conduct enquiry over the forged appointment of respondent No. 7 & 8 and may be directed to terminate the service of the respondent No. 7 and 8. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No. 5 and 6 to conclude enquiry in the forged appointment of the respondent No. 7 and 8 evident in report dated 05.03.2026 (Annexure P-8). 10.3 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to take final decision over the representations of the petitioner (Annexure P-9). 10.4 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection has been raised from other sides. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat