P. RAVINDERNATH REDDY, KADAPA v. THE COMMR., KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORP.
WP/7949/2010 · 2026-02-22
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20360 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20360 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010214512010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 7949 OF 2010 Between: Between:
1. P. RAVINDERNATH REDDY, KADAPA, S/o. Late P.M. Gangi Reddy Proprietor Sai Baba Movies Land Railway Station Road, Kadapa City & District. ...Petitioner AND
1. THE COMMR KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORP, Commissioner, Kadapa, Kadapa District. ...Respondent
Counsel for the Petitioner: V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent S S.NAGESWARAREDDY
2
The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri D. Vigneswar Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri P. Vengal Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporations for Rayalaseema Region.
2. Sri P. Vengal Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporations for Rayalaseema Region representing the Municipal Corporation has submitted Written Instructions furnished by the Commissioner, Kadapa Municipal Corporation. Copy of the Written Instruction is also furnished to the
learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner. This Written Instruction is taken on record.
3. In view of the contents of the Written Instruction, Sri P. Vengal Reddy, learned Standing Counsel states that the cause does not survive because the demand made by the Respondent Corporation against the Writ Petitioner to pay the arrears does not subsists in view of the fact that the Writ Petitioner has paid all the arrears.
4. Sri D. Vigneswar Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, would confirm that the Writ Petitioner has paid the entire arrears and nothing is pending. Having recorded the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. There shall be no Order as to costs.
5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand disposed of in terms of this
Order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 23.02.2026 JKS
3
88
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 7949 OF 2010
23.02.2026
JKS