$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010469552026 + LPA 794/2026 AMNEX INFOTECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Mr. Rahul Patel, Mr. Himanshu Satija, Ms. Ripul Swati, Mr. Suyash Shrivastava & Ms. Radhika, Advs. versus GOOGLE LLC AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Rishay, Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Ms. Priya Adlakha, Ms. Urvi Nama, Ms. Harshali Chauhan, Mr. Ritik Raghwanshi, Ms. Rishika Aggarwal & Ms. Anshu Tulsyan, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA SAHAY SAXENA O R D E R % 29.09.2026 CM APPL. 67583/2026(condonation of delay of 355 days in filing appeal) CM APPL. 67584/2026(condonation of delay of 45 days in re-filing appeal) 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that she has no objection if the delay in filing and re-filing the appeal is condoned. 3. For the reasons stated and averments made in both the applications, this Court is of the opinion that sufficient cause has been stated for condonation of delay. Accordingly, the delay of 355 days in filing and 45 days in re-filing the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2026 at 11:40:51 present appeal is hereby condoned. 4. The applications stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms. LPA 794/2026 & CM APPLs.67579-67582/2026 5. Present appeal has been filed under Clause X of the Letter Patent assailing the impugned order dated 15.07.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) No.53/2024. 6. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the impugned order dated 15.07.2025 is an ex-parte order passed by the learned Single Judge without giving any opportunity of hearing, as a result of which they could not place their objections on record. He submits that the matter may be remanded to the learned Single Judge for adjudication without going into the merits, with liberty to the appellant to raise all their submissions before the learned Single Judge. 7. Learned counsel for the respondents who appears on advance notice has no objection only to the said extent. 8. Therefore, without going into the merits of the case, the appeal is disposed of by permitting the appellant to raise all their grievances before the learned Single Judge who shall after hearing the parties pass a fresh order on merits in accordance with law. 9. The appeal stands disposed of. Pending applications also stand disposed of. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J NISHA SAHAY SAXENA, J SEPTEMBER 29, 2026 ab/jd This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2026 at 11:40:51