( 2026:JHHC:20937 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3772 of 2026 1. Raghunandan Pandit, aged abut 49 years, son of Nepal Pandit, resident of Gali No. 3, Mahavir Colony Satsung, Hirna, Ward No. 9, Koriyatanr, P.O. and P.S. Deoghar, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand 2. Dhiraj Pandit @ Dhiraj Kumar, aged about 24 years, son of Raghunandan Pandit, resident of Gali No. 3, Mahavir Colony Satsung, Hirna, Ward No. 9, Koriyatanr, P.O. and P.S. Deoghar, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Prakash Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, A.P.P. 02/ 15.07.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Deoghar (Town) P.S. Case No. 0375 of 2025 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(4), 352, 109(1), 125(a), 74, 78, 3(5) of BNS, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He next submits that there were free fight between the parties and allegation of assault is not there against the petitioners. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that petitioners used to threaten the people of the locality and the petitioners are in habit of teasing the women of that area and in view of that anticipatory bail of the petitioners may kindly be rejected. 5. In the F.I.R there is direct allegation against the petitioners of demanding extortion and giving threatening to the people of that locality and the petitioners are in habit of teasing the women of that area. ( 2026:JHHC:20937 ) 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. Dt.15.07.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-