Bokka Naga Venkata Ramana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/3521/2021 · 2026-02-18
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20352 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20352 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010216762021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3521/2021 Between:
1.BOKKA NAGA VENKATA RAMANA, S/O.BOKKA VEERA VENKAT SATYANARAYANA, AGE 52 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.5-494, PITHANIVARI VEEDI, KAMANAGARUVU, AMALAPURAM, MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P.-533 201 ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AMALAPURAM POLICE STATION, REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AT VELAGAPUDI.
2.GEDDADA UMA SHANKAR, S/O.SATYANARAYANA, AGE 42 YEARS, OCC. REVENUE INSPECTOR OF AMALAPURAM, R/O.ARRIALAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.INDIRA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
2 ORDER: Despite the matter having been listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there has been no representation on behalf of the Petitioner. Even after affording sufficient opportunity, neither the Petitioner nor their Counsel have chosen to appear or prosecute the case. In view of the continued absence of representation and the failure to advance arguments, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present proceedings. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 19.02.2026 VTS