[2026:RJ-JP:4452] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 133/2024 1. Sadhuram S/o Shri Kaluram (Deceased), R/o Nayak Mohalla, Ramgarh Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar, Raj. 1/1. Vijay Singh S/o Late Shri Sadhuram, Aged About 66 Years, R/o Doli, Tehsil Ramgarh District Alwar Raj. 1/2. Smt. Neetu W/o Late Shri Padmsingh, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Nayak Mohalla, Ramgarh Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar, Raj. 1/3. Yashpal Singh S/o Late Padmsingh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Nayak Mohalla, Ramgarh Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar, Raj. 1/4. Lalit Kumar Nayak S/o Late Padmsingh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Nayak Mohalla, Ramgarh Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar, Raj. 1/5. Sachin Nayak S/o Late Padmsingh, Aged About 17 Years, Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Neetu R/o Nayak Mohalla, Ramgarh Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar, Raj. 1/6. Payal Nayak D/o Late Shri Padmsingh, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Nayak Mohalla, Ramgarh Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar, Raj. ----Plaintiffs/Appellants Versus 1. Amar Singh S/o Kaluram, Aged About 82 Years, R/o Village Doli Tehsil Ramgarh District Alwar Raj. 2. Bharat Singh S/o Shri Chunnilal, R/o Khateek Mohalla, Alawada, Tehsil Ramgarh District Alwar Raj. 3. Smt. Seema Khichi W/o Shri Chandan Singh, R/o Village Alawada, Tehsil Ramgarh District Alwar Raj. 4. Smt. Champa W/o Jagdish, R/o Village Alawada, Tehsil Ramgarh District Alwar Raj. 5. Smt. Babli W/o Hukamsingh, R/o Nayi Basti, Laddu Khvas Ki Gali, Alwar. 6. Vijay Kumar S/o Pooran, R/o Bahadurpur Road, Ramgarh, Tehsil Ramgarh District Alwar (Raj.). ----Defendants/Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:4452] (2 of 2) [CMA-133/2024] For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mohit Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Goyal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Order 30/01/2026 1. It is contended by the learned counsel for the respondent that the suit has been dismissed in default on 31.10.2025. The present appeal is arising out of the order passed on the temporary injunction application in the suit. He, therefore, submits that since the lis is not surviving, the appeal has therefore, rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner-appellant, submits that he has no instructions from his client and he therefore, prays that if the suit has been dismissed in default then he may be given liberty to approach this Court, in case the suit revives. 3. Accordingly, the present appeal stands dismissed with the liberty aforesaid. 4. All pending applications stand disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Jubin/99