[2026:RJ-JP:14599] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1905/2026 Rajendra Suman @ Ballu S/o Chitarlal Mali, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Purana Chabda Raasta, Chipabarod Police Station Chipabarod, District Baran Rajasthan. ( At Present Confined At Jail Baran District Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tushar Saraswat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sriram Dhaka, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 08/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 0249/2025 registered at Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran for offences under Sections 103(1), 331(8) of BNS 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and there is no evidence on record which connect the accused- petitioner with the alleged crime and he is in custody since long. He further submits that Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. Counsel further submits that accused-petitioner has been arrayed as an accused only with an evidence of recovery of Gyati a weapon used for digging sand. 3. Learned counsel Public prosecutor opposed the bail application and submits that there is evidence that the accused- [2026:RJ-JP:14599] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1905/2026] petitioner after having conspiracy went to the scene of crime and committed the offence. They were going all together identified from the CCTV footage. 4. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the challan papers. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has been able to point out the recovery of Gyati at the instance of the accused-petitioner so as to connect the accused-petitioner with the alleged crime. However, the possibility of false implication cannot be ruled out. 5. Taking into consideration overall facts and circum- stances of the case and the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 11.08.2025 so also the fact that Police after comple- tion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /30