HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15184 of 2026 Court No. - 65 (Sl. No. 43 out of 269) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. As informed by learned State Law Officer, notice has been served to the informant on 2.5.2026. 2. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. 3. Heard Sri Ashish Pandey, learned Advocate holding brief for Sri Pramod Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for applicant, Sri Sanjeev Singh, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Sunil Kumar, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on record. 4. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.215 of 2025, under Sections 65(2), 352, 351(3) BNS and 5(m)(F)/6 POCSO Act, Police Station Shrirampur, District Deoria, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail. ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT: 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the allegations are per se false. There is no medical corroboration of the incident. The truth is that informant had taken Rs.1 lakh from the applicant, as her husband was going abroad and she has falsely implicated the applicant to usurp the said amount, as such, the applicant is entitled for bail. 6. The applicant is in jail since 24.11.2025 and is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pramod Kumar Yadav, Randhir Jain Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Srawan Kumar Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) of bail. ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF STATE/INFORMANT: 7. The medical report of the victim corroborates the prosecution story as she has sustained injuries on her vital part. CONCLUSION: 8. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the injuries sustained on the vital parts of the body of victim and she being a girl of tender age i.e. 8 years, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. The bail application is found devoid of merits and is, accordingly, rejected. 9. However, it is directed that the aforesaid case pending before the trial court be decided expeditiously as early as possible, if there is no legal impediment. 10. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. 11. The Registrar Compliance is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the trial court concerned for necessary compliance. May 14, 2026 Shalini BAIL No. 15184 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad