Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20349 (KAR)

B SRIRANGAIAH v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

WP/21998/2025 · 2026-06-10

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27894 WP No. 21998 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 21998 OF 2025 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN: B.SRIRANGAIAH, S/O. LATE B.BANDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, R/AT HOUSE NO.221, 3RD CROSS, 9TH MAIN ROAD, NEAR B.R.AMBEDKAR COLLEGE, MPM LAYOUT, MALLATHAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 056. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BASAVARAJU M.C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, B.M.T.C., CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H.ROAD, SHANTI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. 2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER B.M.T.C., CENTRAL OFFICES, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. 3. THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (PENSION) SUB-REGIONAL OFFICE, BUILDING NO.F-28, NSU BLOCK, NEAR K.R.PURAM, RAILWAY STATION DOORVANI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 016. Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27894 WP No. 21998 of 2025 4. THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE PROVIDENT FUND, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVANA, RAJARAM MOHAN ROY ROAD, BENGALURU-S560 025. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. H.R.RENUKA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SMT. NANDITA HALDIPUR, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.M.C.Basavaraju., counsel for the petitioner, Smt.H.R.Renuka., counsel for respondents 1 and 2 and Smt.Nandita Haldipur., counsel for respondents 3 and 4 have appeared in person. 2. The petition is filed seeking following reliefs: i. Issue a writ in the nature of writ of certiorari by quashing the impugned endorsement bearing No. ban.ma.sa/keka/lepa/bhani/kupi/2025/2022-23 dated 12/01/2023 issued by the second respondent vide Annexure-G to the writ petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27894 WP No. 21998 of 2025 ii. Issue a writ in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the second and third respondents to pay the employees provident fund pension to the petitioner with arrears from the date of retirement till the date of payment under the facts and circumstances of the case and. iii. Pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit to grant under the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the papers with care. 4. Suffice it to note that the petitioner had a grievance about payment of employees provident fund pension with arrears. Hence, he had approached this Court in W.P.No.1900/2022 and, in the said case, the Corporation had filed a detailed statement of objections and brought to the notice of the Court that the Corporation had issued an endorsement on 12.01.2023 informing the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.4,66,751/-, in case he wants to avail the family pension benefits. The petition was dismissed vide order dated:23.07.2024. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27894 WP No. 21998 of 2025 In the present writ petition, a writ is sought to quash the endorsement dated:12.01.2023. A perusal of the endorsement reflects that the Corporation has informed the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.4,66,751/-, in case he wants to avail the family pension benefits. It is pivotal to note that, by virtue of an endorsement dated:12.01.2023, the Corporation had informed the petitioner to deposit the amount, there is nothing wrong in issuing the endorsement. Hence, I find no grounds to interfere with the endorsement and to quash the same. The Writ Petition is devoid of merit. Accordingly, it is rejected. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 66