Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20348 (JHR)

PRAKASH YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

W.P.(Cr.)/248/2026 · 2026-07-15

Rongon Mukhopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:20929 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (Cr.) No. 248 of 2026 --- 1. Prakash Yadav son of late Chhotu Yadav 2. Nitu Devi widow of late Chhotu Yadav 3. Sushma Devi wife of Santosh Yadav 4. Laxmi Devi wife of Baachu Yadav All resident of village Topchanchi, PO & PS Topchanchi, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Dhanbad, PO Hirapur, Dhanbad 3. Prem Chand Mahato 4. Bhagirath Mahato 5. Krishna Mahato 6. Sanjeevan Mahato 7. Pankaj Kumar … … Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Respondents-State : Mrs. Mousmi Chatterjee, AC to G.A. V --- 14/15.07.2026 Heard Mr. Shashank Shekhar, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AC to G.A. V for the State. In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondent no. 2 to forth with register the petition dated 16.02.2026 filed by the petitioners under Section 166 of BNSS and proceed in the accordance with law within a time bound period. A further prayer has been made to restrain the private respondents, their agents, servants and associates from interfering the petitioners’ right to usage of the pathway connecting their residence to the National Highway and direct them for removal of obstruction caused by the private respondents in the natural flow of water from Siddharth Pahaadi to the drainage system at the National Highway. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent no. 2 from which it appears that a case has been registered on 16.06.2026 being M. P. Case No. 617 of 2026. -2- Mr. Shashank Shekhar, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that save and except registering of a case on 16.06.2026 and calling for a report from the Circle Officer, Topchanchi, Dhanbad, there is no progress in the said case. Regard being had to the fact that one of the primary grievances of the petitioner with respect to non-registration of the case has been redressed, this writ application stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to expedite M. P. Case No. 617 of 2026 and conclude the same preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J) 15th July 2026 Uploalded R. Shekhar Cp 3