Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20345 (CHH)

NAGAR PANCHAYAT KIRODIMAL NAGAR v. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER/ SUB- DIVISIONAL OFFICER (REVENUE) RAIGARH

MCC/463/2026 · 2026-05-13

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:22938-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 463 of 2026 Nagar Panchayat Kirodimal Nagar, District- Raigarh (C.G.) Through Its Chief Municipal Officer, Devendra Bahadur Singh, S/o Late Shri K.B. Singh, Aged About- 46 Years, R/o Kirodimal Nagar, Tehsil And District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Applicant versus 1 - Land Acquisition Officer/Sub- Divisional Officer (Revenue) Raigarh District- Raigarh (C.G.) 2 - Fagulal Yadav S/o Late Shri Nannhu Ram Yadav Aged About 62 Years R/o Village- Kokaditarai, Tehsil And District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents For Applicant : Shri Surfaraj Khan, Advocate. For Respondent No.1/State : Shri Akhilesh Kumar, Govt. Advocate. D.B:-Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal, Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 14/05/2026 1. Heard on I.A. No.1/2026, application for condonation of delay of 10 days in filing of this petition. 2. On due consideration and for the reasons assigned in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed and delay in filing this petition is hereby condoned. 3. Also heard on admission. 4. This MCC has been filed for restoration of FAM No.15 of 2023, which was dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 08/01/2026. NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Date: 2026.05.15 10:45:40 +0530 2 5. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that in pursuance to the direction issued by this Court on 08/01/2026, the requisite Court fee of Rs.2,02,490/- has been deposited on 27/02/2026, i.e. much prior to 10/03/2026 as was directed to be deposited vide said order, dated 08/01/2026, however, due to bonafide mistake, the receipt in this regard was not filed. He, therefore, submits that the same be condoned and, the appeal be restored to its original number. 6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, considering further that the applicant has already deposited the requisite Court fee amount of Rs.2,02,490/- well within the time on 27/02/2026 in pursuance to the order dated 08/01/2026 passed by this Court, we are, therefore, inclined to allow this petition. 7. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and FAM No.15 of 2023 is directed to be restored to its original number. No order as to cost. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Judge Kamde