[2026:RJ-JP:4818] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 501/2025 Umershed @ Kala S/o Mouj Khan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Dantla Police Station Khairthal District Khairthal Tijara Raj (At Present Confined In District Jail Alwar) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p 2. Ashok Kumar S/o Gangaram, R/o Khirigachi Khairthal Khairthal Tizara Rajasthan ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3404/2024 Hemant Kumar Alias Golu Son Of Shri Shankar Lal, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Dantia Police Station Khairthal District Khairthal Tijara (At Present In Central Jail Alwar) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. Ashok Nahar Son Of Shri Gugnram, Resident Of Khirigachi Khairthal District Khairthal Tijara ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : None present in (SB Crl. A.S. No.501/2025) Mr. Shivam Sharma for Mr. Harendra Singh in (SB Crl. A.S. No.3404/2024) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 02/02/2026 1. Both the criminal appeals under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) [2026:RJ-JP:4818] (2 of 2) [CRLAS-501/2025] Act, 1989 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the SC/ST Act’) have been filed on behalf of the appellants being aggrieved by the orders dated 03.01.2025 and 10.10.2024 respectively passed by the Special Judge SC/ST (POA) Cases, Alwar in Criminal Misc. Bail Applications No.548/2024 and 521/2024 respectively, whereby the trial Court has dismissed the bail applications filed on behalf of the appellants. 2. The appellants have been arrested in connection with FIR No.556/2023 registered at Police Station Khairthal, District Khairthal-Tijara for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 307, 302, 120-B IPC & Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act and Section 4/25 of Arms Act. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that in the present criminal appeals, trial has been concluded and the appellants have been convicted. Hence, both the appeals filed on behalf of the appellants have become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, both appeals are dismissed as having become infructuous. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN/292-293