[2026:RJ-JP:2119] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16032/2025 Uvej Khan S/o Sh. Akram Khan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o House 4054, Jagannath Shah Ka Rasta, Cheete Walon Ke Piche, Cheete Walon Ka Mohalla Ramganj Bazar, Jaipur. (Accused Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohammad Shahid Hassan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Bhaskar Sharma Mr. Mohd. Masihuddin Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 19/01/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.351/2025 registered at Police Station Ramganj, District Jaipur City (North) for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He again submits that petitioner is brother-in-law of the injured-Danish and due to matrimonial dispute with his sister, FIR has been lodged. The petitioner and the complainant being relatives, both have settled their dispute by way of the compromise. The said compromise is [2026:RJ-JP:2119] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16032/2025] evident from the compromise deed dated 05.01.2026. Petitioner is behind the bars since 13.11.2025. In view of the amicable settlement between the parties, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Learned counsel for the complainant has supported the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that the parties have arrived at a compromise. He further submits that in view of the said settlement, he has no objection if the bail application of the petitioner is allowed. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Uvej Khan S/o Sh. Akram Khan, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/127