ZIABUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Bail Appln./109/2026 · 2026-02-04
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2034 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2034 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010001372026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./109/2026 ZIABUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY AND ANR S/O- BABUL UDDIN CHOUDHURY, R/O- VILL.- MOHANPUR PT- II, KATIRAIL, P.S- KATIGORAH, P.O- KATIGORAH, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN -788805. 2: AKHTAR HUSSAIN LASKAR S/O- ABDUL JALIL LASKAR
R/O- VILL - NOON NAGAR KATIRALI P.S- KATIGORAH DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM PIN -78880 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : TAWHID LASKAR, M A BARBHUYAN.,MR. D K AGARWALA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 05.02.2026 Heard Mr. T.A Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. P.
Page No.# 2/4 Borthakur, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. [2] This application has been filed by the petitioners namely, (1) Ziabur Rahman Choudhury and (2) Akthar Hussain Laskar under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, seeking regular bail in connection with Lanka P.S. Case No. 265/2025 under Sections 21(c)/27A/ 29 of the NDPS Act. [3] The brief fact of the case is that the complainant namely, SI (UB) Bijoy Krishna Das 34 years, son of Madan Das of Lanka Police Station under Hojai DEF lodged a FIR that on 07.12.2025 at approximately 2:36 p.m. a routine naka checking was conducted alongwith staff of Udali PP under Lanka PS at NH- 27, on Lumding to Lanka Road. During naka checking a reliable source informed that a truck bearing Reg. No. AS-26-AC-0381 was transporting illegal drugs from Cachar District. Acting on the information, the said vehicle was intercepted at the naka point and brought to the Udali PP campus. Information regarding the incident was communicated to the OC Lanka PS, who subsequently issued an authorization letter for search and seizure. The vehicle was searched in presence of three independent witnesses namely- 1. Md. After Uddin (48 years), son of late Ayub Ali, R/O-Bordoloi Pathar, P.S. Lanka,
2. Md. Asadur Rahman (26 Yrs), S/O- Md. Khalilur Rahman, R/O of same locality, 3. Md. Ajim Uddin (38 Yrs), S/O- Late Arif Ali, R/O- Udali Tiniali Gaon, PS- Lanka. During the lawful search, total nine plastic soap boxes containing nine packets of suspected heroin weighing a total of 270 grams were recovered from the possession of 1. Ziabur Rahman Choudhury (26 Yrs) son of Md.
Babul Uddin Choudhury, R./O- Mohanpur Part-II, P.S. Katigorah, District- Cachar and 2. Page No.# 3/4 Akthar Hussain Laskar (19 Yrs), S/O- Md. Abdul Jalil Laskar, R/O- Noonnagar, P.S. Katigorah, District- Cachar. In presence of the independent witnesses, and one sample (A 1) tested using a Drug Detection (DD) Kit. At the same time inside the inspected truck 273 bags of routa betel nuts weighing approximately 14,644 kg were also found loaded and were seized as per proper procedure. In presence of independent witnesses, the suspected contraband were properly measured and sealed and seized following all mandatory procedure under the NDPS Act. Hence, the case. [4] The learned counsel for the petitioners has assailed the arrest primarily on the ground of non-compliance of the provision of Section 48 of the BNSS, 2023 relating to service of written ground of arrest upon the relatives/ friends/ nominated persons of the arrestees and subsequently violation of the provision of Vihaan Kumar Vs. State of Haryana & Another, reported in (2025) SCC Online SC 269. [5] The notice under Section 48 of BNSS, 2023 was issued addressed to the mother of the petitioner No. 2 and uncle of the petitioner No. 1 which are annexed to the instant bail application and the same are also available in the case diary. [6] Upon perusal of the same, it is found that both the notices were issued but no ground of arrest has been mentioned therein. [7] The learned Addl. P.P. submits that in the remand order passed by the learned Magistrate, it has been observed that the accused persons stated that their family members are informed of their arrest. However, they did not state that the ground of the arrest is known to the family members in writing or otherwise.
Page No.# 4/4 [8] Having regard to the above, it is evident that the arrest has been rendered illegal on account of violation of Section 48 of BNSS, 2023 as well as the direction of the Apex Court in Vihaan Kumar (Supra). Consequently, the prayer for bail is allowed. [9] In view of the above, the petitioners namely, namely, (1) Ziabur Rahman Choudhury and (2) Akthar Hussain Laskar shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 1, 00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) each with two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Hojai in connection with the aforementioned case. [10] It is further provided that on such release, an application for remand or custody, if required, will be moved along with the reasons and necessity for the same, after the supply of the grounds of arrest in writing setting forth the explanation for non-supply thereof within the above stipulated schedule. On receipt of such an application, the magistrate shall decide the same expeditiously and preferably within a week of submission thereof by adhering to the principles of natural justice. It would be open for the I.O. to proceed as per the procedure prescribed in Mihir Rajesh Shah Vrs. State of Maharasta: 2025 INSC 1288 in case of custody of the petitioners found to be necessary. [11] In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant