TATA COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED v. INTELLECT DESIGN ARENA LIMITED & ANR.
ARB.P./1218/2026 · 2026-09-30
Om Prakash Shukla
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20338 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20338 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010326912026 + ARB.P. 1218/2026 & I.A. 19449/2026
TATA COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Kala, Ms. Kanishka Rawat, Advs.
versus
INTELLECT DESIGN ARENA LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER(ORAL) %
30.09.2026
1. At the outset, Mr. Nitin Kala, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous on the ground that parties have already arrived at a settlement.
2. As both the parties have signed the mediation and conciliation agreement dated 21.09.2026, the cause of action does not survive.
3. Both parties undertake that they will abide by the settlement terms contained in the mediation and conciliation agreement dated
21.09.2026.
4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J SEPTEMBER 30, 2026/at
Signed By:PRAGYA ARORA Signing Date:30.09.2026 19:45:58