Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20337 (RAJ)

GOPAL S/O HARETI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16142/2025 · 2026-01-06

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:154] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16142/2025 Gopal S/o Hareti, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Mirjapur, Gangapurcity, Presently Resident Of Udhadmal Balaji, Police Station Sadar Gangapurcity, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Gangapur City) ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 06/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.139/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, 125 & 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the allegation against the accused-petitioner is of causing injury to the complainant by an iron rod. [2026:RJ-JP:154] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16142/2025] 5. Learned counsel also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 26.09.2025 and there is no definite opinion of the Medical Jurist that the injury attributed to the present accused- petitioner is dangerous to life. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 7. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the accused-petitioner and so also the fact that there is no definite opinion of the Medical Jurist that the injury attributed to the present accused-petitioner is dangerous to life and the accused- petitioner is in custody since 26.09.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 8. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /161