APHC010210412025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 11071/2025 Between: 1. S. CHINNAPAPAMMA,, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS NOW, W/O. LATE S. SRIRAMULU, OCCUPATION- AGRICULTURE, R/O 1- 1, BANDAKADAPALLI, DAMALCHERUVU, PAKALA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI REVENUE DIVISION, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PAKALA MANDAL, PAKALA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a direction, an order or writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to interfere with the petitioners ownership, possession, cultivation and enjoyment of subject 2 agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 0-48 cents in Sy. No. 2258/2C/B of Damalcheruvu Village, Pakala Mandal, Tirupati District arbitrarily and illegally without there being any land acquisition proceedings and without any notice to the petitioner who is in possession, cultivation and enjoyment of the property for more than 40 years as oppressive, illegal void and arbitrary and being in violation of principles of natural justice and violative of the petitioners rights enshrined under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and to direct the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to not encroach and/or interfere with the Petitioners possession, cultivation and enjoyment of subject land in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to nut enter into Lire subject agricultural land admeasuring area of Ac. 0-48 cents in Sy. No. 2258/2C/B of Damalcheruvu Village, Pakala Mandal, Tirupati District and likewise to not interfere with the petitioner's possession, cultivation and enjoyment of subject agricultural land including to not plot and/or distribute house sites within the subject agricultural land pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAMINENI PAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 in interfering with the petitioner’s ownership, possession, cultivation and enjoyment of subject agricultural land admeasuring Ac.0.48 cents in Sy.No.2258/2C/B of Damalacheruvu Village, Pakala Mandal, Tirupati District. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the counter of the 4th respondent submits that the official respondents are not interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioner’s subject land. There is no such proposal with this respondent for the purpose of providing house sites to the weaker sections. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 16.03.2026 NNN