Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20332 (JHR)

SUDHIR KUMAR ALIAS PAKODI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5241/2026 · 2026-07-15

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:20965] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5241 of 2026 ------ Sudhir Kumar @ Pakodi, Aged about 26 years, Son of Dhaneshwar Mehta, Resident of Villalge- Hadari, P.O. & P.S.- Ichak, District- Hazaribagh .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated-15-07-2026 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner files a Supplementary Affidavit. Let the same be kept in the record. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No.60 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 331 (4) and 305 (a) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft of gold and silver jewelleries from the house of the informant by committing house breaking in the night. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of his self-confessional statement and leading to recovery of some of the melted jewelleries from the co-accused Raj Kumar Soni and some of the jewelleries from his own house. It is also submitted that charge-sheet has also been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.04.2026 as has been mentioned in para- 13 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Hazaribagh in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No.60 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-15.07.2026-Animesh/