1 2026:CGHC:21335 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2285 of 2026 1 - Habib Bhai S/o Late Ahmad Bhai, Aged About 60 Years Bus Operator R/o Chauhan Gali,shitlapara,kanker, Distt. Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Transport Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Secretary Regional Transport Authority Raipur Distt.Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Bharat Lal Dembra, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Shri Shobhit Mishra, Dy GA. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07/05/2026 1. This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the followings reliefs:- "10.1 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ of direction, directing the respondent no.2 to decide the application of the petitioner dated 10.12.2025/15.12.2025 for transfer of permanent stage carriage permit bearing no. CG2025-SC-0090A( 158/RTA/R/2025) for the route Kotalbhatti to Raipur via Sarona, Kanker, Charama, Dhamtari, Kurud, Abhanpur with one return trip daily valid upto 12.03.2020, in accordance with law. AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.05.12 18:05:53 +0530 2 10.2 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to dispose off the petition in light of order dated 11.03.2026 passed in W.P.(C) no. 1028/2026 as the similar facts involved in that case also. 10.3 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper looking to the facts and circumstances of the case may also be awarded to the petitioner including the cost and expenses of this petition." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to concerned respondent Authority to consider and decide pending application/representation dated 10.12.2025/ 15.12.2025 of the petitioner (Annexure-P/2), expeditiously, within specific time. 3. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts of the case and the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, which is not opposed by the State Counsel, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage, directing respondent No.2 to consider and decide the pending application/representation dated 10.12.2025/15.12.2025 (Annexure-P/2) of the petitioner, in accordance with relevant law/rules/regulations, preferably within an outer limit of '30 days' from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash