APHC010208152024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10632/2024 Between: 1. C.H. HUSSAIN @ RAHUL,, S/O. MD. RAFI @ SREENIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O. RAHAMATH NAGAR, IVTH WARD, BANGARUPETA POST, VENKATAGIRI TOWN, POST MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522502. 3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, GUDUR, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VENKATAGIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. L SUDHAKAR REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENKATAGIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 2 7. E V RAMANAIAH, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC THE ASSISTANT SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE (ASI) VENKATAGIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 8. P NAZEER, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC THE POLICE CONSTABLE, VENKATAGIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 9. V CHENCHU KRISHNAIAH, S/O. NOT KNOWN. AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE, VENKATAGIRI BAR ASSOCIATION, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 10. K MUNIKIRAN KIRAN, S/O. LATE KOTESWAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1-264, CHAVIDI VEEDHI, BANGARUPETA, VENKATAGIRI POLICE STATION, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BASHA SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10632/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the highhanded action of the Respondents Nos. 5 to 8 misusing their official powers by entering into civil dispute and repeatedly insisting and threatening the Petitioner in not entering into the Petitioner property and supporting illegal activities of the Respondents Nos. 9 and 10, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents No. 2 to 4 to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 21.03.2024 and take departmental action against the RespondentsNo. 6 to 8 for their illegal acts as they have been interfering in civil disputes and thereby restraining the Petitioner from enjoying property.…” 2. Heard Sri Basha Shaik, learned counsel for the petitioner through V.C., and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent- police are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions would submit that the respondent-police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties and they are not calling the petitioner to the police station. 4 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10632/2024 Dated.05.01.2026 UPS