[ 2026:JHHC:20794] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3839 of 2026 Jainual Ansari @ Jainul Abedin, aged about 29 years, Son of Kamil Ansari, Resident of Village Khala, P.O. & P.S. Dhurki, Dist.- Garhwa. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Sajid Yunus, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pathak, A.P.P. ------ 05/ 14.07.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dhurki P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025, registered for the offence under Section 108 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nagar Untari. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioner is nothing to do with the suicide made by the deceased, who happened to be the brother of the informant. He next submits that in the FIR itself it has come that in the dying declaration, the deceased has stated that he was having the dispute with his wife. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner was having the affair with the wife of the deceased due to that the deceased has committed suicide. He next submits that even the daughter of the deceased has seen that this petitioner along with others came in her house and handed over one green coloured sachet to her mother and her mother has mixed the [ 2026:JHHC:20794] -2- said sachet in the water and given to her father and thereafter her father started vomiting and subsequently he died. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. It has come that the petitioner was having the affair with the wife of the deceased, for that the deceased was upset and it has come in the order of the learned Sessions Judge that in para-13 of the case diary, it has come that the daughter of the deceased, who is aged about 9 years has stated that at about 5:00 A.M., this petitioner and two others came to her house and gave the clothes in a plastic bag to her mother and left from there and after some times when her father woke up, her mother took out a green coloured sachet from the plastic bag and after opening it, she mixed the same into water and gave it to her father and after drinking it, her father started vomiting and died during treatment. It transpires that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of instigating the deceased. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-14.07.2026 Amitesh/-