Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20326 (AP)

Meesala Gandhi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/3635/2021 · 2026-01-22

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010204432021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3635/2021 Between: 1.MEESALA GANDHI,, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 32. YEARS, R/O CHILLAPETA VILLAGE, DUPPADA PANCHAYAT, VIZIANAGARAM MANDAL AND DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, I TOWN POLICE STATION, VIZIANAGARAM, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR , HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI. 2.BURLI LAXMANA, S / O LATE SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC MECHANIC, R/ O. CHILLAPETA VILLAGE, DUPPADA PANCHAYAT, VIZIANAGARARRI MANDAL AND DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.TADDI NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: Sri Taddi Nageswara Rao, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous inasmuch as Petitioner was acquitted. Recording the above submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 23.01.2026 VTS