Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20324 (AP)

K SHIVA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/9408/2019 · 2026-02-04

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010212442019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9408/2019 Between: 1. K SHIVA, S/O KURUVA SHIVANNA, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O H.NO.22/264, KURUVA STREET, GUNTAKAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, GUNTAKAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, GUNTAKAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondent no.4 in calling petitioner to police station there by putting him to illegal confinement without there being any complaints on the pretext that his name is in History Sheet as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2 Respondent no.4 to not to call the Petitioner to police station for putting him to illegal confinement and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent no. 4 to not to harass the petitioner by calling him to the police station regularly without any case being pending, pending disposal of the writ petition before this Hon'ble court, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.9408 OF 2019 ORDER: None appeared for the petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. There was no representation for the petitioner on the previous adjournment also. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 05.02.2026 Pmk 4 47 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:9408 OF 2019 Date: 05.02.2026 Pmk