Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20322 (KAR)

SMT MADEVAMMA @ MAHADEVAMMA v. SMT JAYAMMA

RFA/1590/2025 · 2026-06-09

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27666 RFA No. 1590 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1590 OF 2025 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MADEVAMMA @ MAHADEVAMMA W/O MALLE GOWDA, D/O LATE KALE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS. 2. SMT. DODAMMA, W/O MAHADEVAPPA D/O LATE KALE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS. 3. SMT. PUTTAMMA, W/O S. MALLU, D/O LATE KALE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO. 3299, 4TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN, 2ND STAGE, KUMARASWANY LAYOUT, J.P. NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 078. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SATISH CHANDRA R, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O LATE BASAVA Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27666 RFA No. 1590 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 2. SRI. B. MANJUNATH, S/O LATE BASAVA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 3. MISS. ROOPA D/O LATE BASAVA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT NO. K-48, 12TH CROSS, KETAMARANAHALLI, 1ST BLOCK, RAJAJINAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 010. 4. SMT. NANJAMMA D/O LATE KALE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 3299, 4TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN, 2ND STAGE, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, J.P.NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 078. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. R.S. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 3.02.2025 PASSED ON IA NO.1/2022 IN OS NO.3461/2016 ON THE FILE OF XL ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY., ALLOWING THE IA NO.1/2022 FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(b) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27666 RFA No. 1590 of 2025 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Heard learned counsel for the appellants. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo to convert the present Regular First Appeal into Civil Revision Petition. 3. The said memo is placed on record and the Registry is directed to convert the present Regular First Appeal into Civil Revision Petition. For statistical purpose, the Regular First Appeal is disposed of. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17