$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010254802026 + RC.REV. 199/2026, CM APPL. 37891/2026 (Stay),CM APPL. 37893/2026 (For substitution of LRs of deceased Petitioner No.1) & CM APPL. 53694/2026 (Seeking direction to the petitioner to pay the use and occupation charges) BHAGWAN SINGH (DECEASED THROUGH LRS) AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: None. versus VIPIN ARORA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Anjanan Gosain & Ms. Anita Burman, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 28.09.2026 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, seeking the following reliefs: “a. The petition be accepted; b. Trial Court record be summoned. c. The impugned order dated 30.08.2025 passed in petition No.RC-ARC-34/2022 passed by the court of Shri Mohit Sharma, SCJ/RC (South East), Saket Court Delhi be set aside and the petitioner may be granted leave to defend and contest the eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act by the respondent/landlord.; d. Pass such other and further order as deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. This Court, vide Order dated 29.05.2026, had recorded that the Petitioners would be vacating the subject premises on or before 31.10.2026 and directed that an Affidavit of Undertaking to this effect This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2026 at 11:49:39 be placed before the next date of hearing. 3. The matter was subsequently taken up by this Court on 10.07.2026, on which date it was submitted that the Petitioners would be vacating the subject premises within a period of one week from 10.07.2026. 4. None has appeared on behalf of the Petitioners thereafter and on the two previous dates, i.e., on 13.08.2026 as also on 31.08.2026. Today also, there is no appearance on behalf of the Petitioners. 5. This Court is of the view that, considering that an undertaking had already been made before this Court and pursuant thereto, the Petitioners had reiterated the said undertaking of vacating the subject premises, none appearing on behalf of the Petitioners is only a means to avoid the proceedings. 6. This Court is, therefore, of the view that no purpose would be served in keeping the present Petition pending and the same is accordingly dismissed. 7. The Respondent is at liberty to take such steps as are available in law to execute the Impugned Order. 8. The present Petition, along with pending Application(s), if any, stands disposed of in the above terms. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. SEPTEMBER 28, 2026/tk/va This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2026 at 11:49:39