Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20317 (JHR)

ABUL ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5559/2026 · 2026-07-15

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:20975 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5559 of 2026 Abul Ansari son of Dhiraj Ansari … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Parwej Ahmad Khan, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, APP For the Informant : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate --- 03/15.07.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No. 218 of 2025, S.T. No. 07 of 2026 for the offences registered under Sections 127(1), 126(2), 303(2) , 351(2), 109, 125(a), 117(2), 74, 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Bokaro. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected in B.A. No. 2394 of 2026 vide order dated 25.03.2026. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 08.09.2025 and cognizance has been taken on 26.11.2025, charge has already been framed and the evidence is going on. However, parties have settled their dispute. He further submits that the charge has been framed under Sections 109/3(5) and other analogous sections. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that as on date evidence is going on. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of informant of the case, who happens to be the wife of the person who suffered grievous injury on his head, submits on instructions, that he has no objection if the petitioner is enlarged on bail. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the period of custody of the petitioner, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. ( 2026:JHHC:20975 ) 2 Twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Bokaro, in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No. 218 of 2025, S.T. No. 07 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) Both the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner. (ii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iii) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (iv) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 7. Let this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail. 8. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 15.07.2026 Uploaded on: 15.07.2026 Binit/