$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010469782026 + W.P.(C) 14435/2026, CM APPL. 67661/2026, CM APPL. 67662/2026 RWA DWARKA PUNARWAS COLONY (REGD.) …..Petitioner Through: Ms. Binisa Mohanty & Mr. Prang Newmai, Advocates (M- 9999176557) versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. …..Respondents Through: Ms Deeksha L. Kakar, Ms Sana Parveen, Ms Kajal, Advs. for DDA and STF (M-9313119255) Ms Latika Malhotra, Advocate for DDA (M-9811895162) Mr. Niraj Kumar, Sr. Central Govt. Counsel for Delhi Police (M- 9810020341) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 29.09.2026 1. By virtue of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “(a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ or order or direction to the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, to initiate steps to demolish the unauthorized construction of temple constructed on government land in front of plot Nos. C-285 & C-287, at the corner of park in J.J. Colony, Sector-15, Dwarka and to prevent any further encroachment/illegal This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2026 at 12:11:46 construction on the said government land; and/or; (b) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other suitable writ, order or direction to Respondent No. 3/Special Task Force to forthwith decide the Petitioner’s representations dated 13.09.2024, 27.01.2025 & 10.08.2026; and/or; (c) Pass any such other order / direction as this Honʼble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. At the outset, without adverting to the merits involved, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2/ DDA and 3/STF, supported by learned counsel for the respondent no.1/ MCD, submits that in compliance of the earlier orders passed by this Court in various writ petition(s) filed by the very same petitioner, the grievances of the petitioner has already been referred to the Religious Committee vide 165th Minutes of Special Task Force dated 31.08.2026. He further submits that both the MCD and the DDA have already taken proactive steps pursuant thereto. 3. Being satisfied with the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3, who is supported by learned counsel for the respondent no.1, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law, if, as and when required. 4. As such, the present petition, alongwith the pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. SAURABH BANERJEE, J SEPTEMBER 29, 2026/So This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2026 at 12:11:46