Mayur Pramod Thakur v. the state of Maharashtra through secretary tribal development department mantralya
CP/684/2026 · 2026-10-09
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20316 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20316 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CONT. PETITION NO. 684 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1 CONT. PETITION NO. 684 OF 2026 IN WP/6162/2026 Mayur Pramod Thakur And Others Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ • Mr. Wagh Mukulanand Ravikant, Advocate for the Petitioner • Ms. M. N. Ghanekar,AGP for Respondent/s - State __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 09, 2026 PER COURT : 1) Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board. 2) Learned AGP, on instructions, submits that the tribe claims of the petitioners would be decided within two weeks. 3) We record the said statement as an undertaking to this Court and dispose of this contempt petition. 4) We make it clear that if the claims are not decided within the aforesaid stipulated period, then it will be treated as an aggravated form of contempt on the part of the respondent-Scrutiny Committee.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble
Page| 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:48901-DB