[2026:RJ-JP:226] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7948/2025 1. Kuljeet S/o Chhitarmal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Malipura, Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur. 2. Mohandei W/o Kuljeet, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Malipura, Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. Laxmichand @ Lakhmichand, S/o Shri Narayan Singh, Aged About 66 Years, R/o Village Malipura, Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Singhal For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Saroj Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 06/01/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the order dated 20.11.2025 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, No.1, Bharatpur, Raj. in Criminal Case No.484/2018 arising out of FIR No.140/2016 registered at Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 & 406 of IPC alongwith all consequential and subsequent proceedings arising thereto. 2. After registration of the aforesaid FIR, the police conducted investigation in the matter and filed final report under Section 173 [2026:RJ-JP:226] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7948/2025] Cr.P.C. before the learned court below for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 & 406 of IPC. 3. On 20.11.2025, both the parties filed an application for compounding the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 & 406 of IPC. It is stated in the application that the parties have resolved their dispute amicably and entered into a compromise. 4. The trial Court partly allowed the application and permitted to compound the offence under Sections 420 & 406 of IPC vide order dated 20.11.2025 but the prayer in respect of other offences was not accepted as the same are not compoundable. 5. In these circumstances, the petitioners have approached this Court by way of this petition to quash the FIR alongwith entire proceedings on the ground that the parties have resolved their dispute. 6. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the complainant has no objection if the FIR in question and all subsequent proceedings are quashed. 7. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for my perusal; considering that the parties have resolved their dispute amicably, this Court is of the view that in order to establish peace and harmony between the parties and in order to let them live peacefully in the future life, and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) [2026:RJ-JP:226] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7948/2025] 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604], the impugned FIR and all subsequent criminal proceedings are liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties although the remaining offences alleged to be made out in the instant case are not compoundable. 8. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the order dated 20.11.2025 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, No.1, Bharatpur, Raj. in Criminal Case No.484/2018 arising out of FIR No.140/2016 registered at Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur alongwith all consequential and subsequent proceedings are quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 9. The stay application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /147