Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27577 WP No. 15044 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 15044 OF 2023 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
VANISHREE, W/O. JAYANTH S.JOGI, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.3-137, VAMANJOOR-PILIKULA ROAD, BHAVISHYA NAGAR, MANGALORE, D.K.DISTRICT-574 028. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. DEEPTHI SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. DHANANJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. AUTHORISED OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, S.A.R.B., 3RD FLOOR, NO.11/90, J.C.ROAD, (NEAR OLD SHIVAJI TALKIES), OPP. TRUST WELL HOSPITAL, BENGALURU-560 002. 2. THE ASSISTNAT GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, ASSET RECOVERY MANAGEMENT BRANCH, 3RD FLOOR, NO.11/90, J.C.ROAD, (NEAR OLD SHIVAJI TALIKES), BENGALURU-560 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHASHANK, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. CHITHRA NIRMALA P., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27577 WP No. 15044 of 2023
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Smt.Deepthi Shetty., counsel on behalf of Sri.Dhananjay Kumar., for the petitioner and Sri.Shashank., counsel on behalf of Smt.Chithra Nirmala.P., for the respondents have appeared in person. 2. The petition is filed seeking following reliefs: i. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus Directing the Respondents to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 13.04.2023 vide ANNEXURE-A and direct the Respondents to grant a time period of 2 months to pay Balance amount. ii. Grant such other further relief as may deem fit in the circumstances of the case. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the papers with care. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27577 WP No. 15044 of 2023
4. Suffice it to note that the petitioner had filed representation on 13.04.2023 to direct the respondents to grant a time period of two months to pay balance amount. This prayer cannot be accorded. The property in question has already been sold on 26.08.2025 and this Court has passed a suitable order in the connected W.P.No.32881/2025. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in the present petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 74.1