Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20311 (KAR)

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER v. SRI E BASAVARAJAPPA,

MFA/4671/2025 · 2026-06-08

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27018 MFA No. 4671 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4671 OF 2025 (LAC) BETWEEN: THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER UPPER BHADRA PROJECT, HOSADURGA DIVISION, HOSADURGA, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT …APPELLANT (BY SRI. PRASHANTH B.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. E. BASAVARAJAPPA, S/O. ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/O. KARADIKATTE VILLAGE, MADADAKERE HOBLI HOSADURGA TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, UPPER BHADRA PROJECT, CHITRADURGA, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHITRADURGA, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27018 MFA No. 4671 of 2025 THIS MFA IS FILED U/S. 74(1) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 05.04.2025 PASSED IN LAC NO.88/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHITRADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION U/S.64(1) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is present. He has filed a memo stating that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties by way of filing a joint memo before the Lok-Adalath in EP.No.208/2025 (LAC No.88/2019). - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27018 MFA No. 4671 of 2025 2. In view of the same, the present appeal would not survive any more for consideration. Hence, the appeal is withdrawn as settled between the parties. 3. In view of the withdrawal of this appeal and the matter having been settled between the parties, the registry shall refund the court fee to the appellant if any, paid in accordance with the Karnataka Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9