[2026:RJ-JP:4578] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15960/2025 Rajesh @ Raju S/o Bhanwar Singh, aged about 27 Years, R/o Phoolwada Pepat, Police Station Vajirpur, District Sawai Mad- hopur, Rajasthan. (At present confined in Jail Gangapur City). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish K Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP & Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 31/01/2026 1. This bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.125/2025 registered at Police Station Piloda, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) for offence punishable under Section 8/21 of NDPS Act. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for offences punishable under Sections 8/21 & 8/29 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since 16.11.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2026:RJ-JP:4578] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15960/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. He submits that five other cases have been registered against the petitioner and out of which, one case is under the NDPS Act. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Rajesh @ Raju S/o Bhanwar Singh shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakh Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.2,50,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Fifty Thousand Only), each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. Considering the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, it is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till conclusion of the trial. [2026:RJ-JP:4578] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15960/2025] 8. Concerned SHO shall enter attendance of the petitioner in the Roznamcha. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /63