DEVENDRA KUMAR S/O SHREE DEENDAYAL SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/16000/2025 · 2026-01-19
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20301 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20301 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:2117] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16000/2025 Devendra Kumar S/o Shree Deendayal Sharma, R/o Pandey Roopwaas Police Station Reni District Alwar At Present House Number 107, Girraj Nagar Sumel Road, Agra Road Jaipur Police Station Jamdoli Jaipur (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sikander Ali Chopdar Ms. Shama Aajmi Ms. Afroza Bano For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Javed Mohd. Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 19/01/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.339/2025 registered at Police Station Jamdoli, Jaipur City (East)for offence under Sections 115(2) and 126(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He again submits that the petitioner and the complainant are residents of the same locality and are neighbours. He contends that although the victim, Gaurav, sustained injuries which are described as dangerous to life but the
[2026:RJ-JP:2117] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16000/2025] victim and the petitioner have amicably resolved their dispute. The said compromise is evident from the submission made by the
learned counsel appearing for the complainant. Petitioner is behind the bars since 02.10.2025. In view of the amicable settlement between the parties, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5.
Learned counsel for the complainant has supported the
arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that the parties have arrived at a compromise. He further submits that in view of the said settlement, he has no objection if the bail application of the petitioner is allowed.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Devendra Kumar S/o Shree Deendayal Sharma, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/124