Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2030 (CAL)

SANJAY CHAKRABORTY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/6247/2026 · 2026-03-19

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

13. 13. (DL) (DL) 19.03.2026 19.03.2026 Ct. No. 05 (ARPAN) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 6247 OF 2026 SANJAY CHAKRABORTY VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS Mr. Sabab Uddin Laskar, Adv. …for the Petitioner Mr. Mohan Kumar Sanyal, Adv. Mr. Milan Kumar Maity, Adv. …for the State 1. At the time of call learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed as based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner concerned police authority has registered FIR. 2. State respondents are represented by learned advocates. 3. Considering the submission made on behalf of the petitioner, no further order need be passed in this writ petition. 4. Writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)