Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 203 (RAJ)

NIKITA KUMARI DAUGHTER OF SHRI DHARAMVEER SINGH, v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/309/2026 · 2026-03-18

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11722] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 309/2026 1. Nikita Kumari Daughter Of Shri Dharamveer Singh, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of 83C, Mahila Mohalla Madanpur Khadar, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi, Aadhar Number - 599368330261. 2. Shri Sohail Son Of Shri Mohammad Haroon, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Govind Nagar, Amer Road, Jaipur. Aadhar Number - 259767015228. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Police Commissionerate Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Deputy Commissioner Of Police (South), Police Commissionerate, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Jaisinghpura Khor, District Jaipur (Raj.). 5. Station House Officer, Police Station Brahmpuri, District Jaipur (Raj.). 6. Mohammad Haroon (Father Of The Boy) Son Of Fazruddin, R/o 14, Govind Nagar, Amer Road, Tripolia Bazaar, Jaipur. 7. Firoz Alias Naveen (Maternal Uncle), R/o 14, Govind Nagar, Amer Road, Tripolia Bazaar, Jaipur. 8. Dharamveer Singh (Father Of The Girl) Son Of Naresh Prasad, Resident Of 83-C Womens Mohalla Madanpur Khadar, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi. 9. Rana Singh (Uncle Of Girl), Resident Of 83-C Womens Mohalla Madanpur Khadar, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ahishek Jhingania, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP [2026:RJ-JP:11722] (2 of 3) [CRLW-309/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 18/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondents No.6 to 9 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that the petitioners are living in a live-in-relationship and in this regard, an agreement dated 08.12.2025 has also been executed between them, which has been annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondents No.6 to 9 are not happy with their relationship and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondent, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.5 - Station House Officer, Police Station Brahmpuri, District Jaipur City (North) (Raj.) and respondent No.5 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed [2026:RJ-JP:11722] (3 of 3) [CRLW-309/2026] before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/201