2026:JHHC:20819 --1-- A.B.A. No. 3830 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3830 of 2026 ---- 1. Sudama Ram, aged about 65 years, son of Late Baldhani Ram 2. Dilip Ram @ Dilip Kumar Ram, age about 50 years, son of Bhagadu Ram 3. Satish Ram @ Satish Kumar, age about 30 years, son of Late Somnath Ram @ Sobhnath Ram 4. Arjun Ram @ Arjun Kumar Ram @ Arjun Kumar Ravi, age about 22 years, son of Nandan Ram @ Nandan Kumar Ram 5. Vishal Kumar Ram @ Vishal Kumar, age about 22 years, son of Sri Bhrigunath Ram 6. Hariom Ram @ Hariom Kumar Ram @ Hariom Kumar Ravi, age about 26 years, son of Mohan Ram 7. Raushan Kumar Ram @ Raushan Kumar, age about 24 years, son of Bhrigunath Ram 8. Meghnath Ram, age about 33 years, son of Dhandev Ram 9. Ajay Ram @ Ajay Kumar Ram, age about 45 years, son of Late Ramsundar Ram 10. Amit Ram @ Amit Kumar, age about 22 years, son of Late Ravindra Ram @ Savindra Ram All are resident of village – Laharbanjari, PO – Untari Road, PS- Pandu, District - Palamau .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Manoj Kr. No.2, Advocate For the State :- Shree Prakash Jha, Advocate ---- 02/14.07.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2026:JHHC:20819 --2-- A.B.A. No. 3830 of 2026 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Untari Road P.S. Case No.15 of 2026, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 126(2), 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Palamau at Daltonganj. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners and informant’s sides are residing in the same village and the altercation took place when the vehicle was parked on the road. He further submits that now good sense has prevailed between them and they have compromised the matter and compromise petition has been filed before the learned Sessions Judge in ABP No.537 of 2026 contained in Annexure-3. He then submits that there are case and counter case and both the cases have been compromised between the parties. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of assault. 5. Annexure-3 is a document which clearly suggests that compromise has reached between the parties and there are case and counter case and it has been pointed out that both the cases have been compromised. In the attending facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby 2026:JHHC:20819 --3-- A.B.A. No. 3830 of 2026 directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with Untari Road P.S. Case No.15 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 14.07.2026 Sangam/