Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20293 (CHH)

Ratnu Ram Dhruv v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1097/2022 · 2026-05-06

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21466 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1097 of 2022 Ratnu Ram Dhruv S/o Late Ddau Lal Dhruv Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Bhusrenga, Kurud, Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Additional Secretary, Finance Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Senior Accounts Officer, Officer Of The Accounting General, (A And E), Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Block Education Officer, Kurud Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Joint Director, Treasury Accounts And Pension, Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Akash Kumar Kundu, Advocate For respective Respondent(s) : Mr. Keshav Prasad Gupta, Government Advocate Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 07/05/2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the instant matter is pertaining to the excess payment of GPF amount and calculation thereof. He would pray that this matter 2 may be referred to the the High Power Pension Redressal Committee to decide the dispute involved in the present case. 2. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents would oppose the submission made by counsel for the petitioner. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that disputed questions of facts are involved in the present case, therefore, this matter is referred to the High Power Pension Redressal Committee to decide the dispute involved in this case. The committee is directed to decide the dispute after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other interested parties within period of 6 months. 4. Office of Advocate General is also directed to supply one copy of this petition along with necessary documents to the said committee. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the instant petition is hereby disposed of. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Nadim