Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20293 (AP)

M/S BHAVANI CONSTRUCTIONS v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/10947/2025 · 2026-03-11

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010210352025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 10947/2025 Between: 1. M/S BHAVANI CONSTRUCTIONS, D.NO. 23-7-28, DUGGIRALIVANI STREET, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, N. KONDALA RAO S/O CHINNA VEERA RAJU, 2. N. KONDALA RAO, S/O CHINNA VEERA RAJU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O D.NO. 23-7-28, DUGGIRALIVANI STREET, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ROADS AND BUILDINGS (RANDB) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF ENGINEER, R AND B CIRCLE, SRIKAKULAM CIRCLE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B DIVISION, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the payment for the work i.e., Widening and strengthening of Calingapatnam-Srikakulam- Parvathipuram Road from KM 28/6 TO 39/0 IN SRIKAKULAM for an amount of Rs. 8,69,96,283/- towards 3rd and 4th bills as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities to release Rs. 8,69,96,283/-towards 3rd and 4th bills forthwith for the above said work executed by the petitioner and pass such order are orders that the Honorable Court may deem fit and prop IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct respondents to consider for payment of amount of Rs. 8,69,96,283/ towards 31d and 4th bills for the pending bill for the works executed by ' petitioner i.e., Widening and strengthening of Calingapatnam- Srika Parvathipuram Road from KM 28/6 TO 39/0 IN SRIKAKULAM fo amount of Rs. 8,69,96,283/- towards 3rd and 4th bills forthwith, pens disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. AMARLAPUDI ANITHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.10947 OF 2025 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 12.03.2026 KAS 4 91 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.10947 of 2025 Date: 12.03.2026 KAS