Nirmala & others vs. LAO & others OMP(M) No. 490 of 2026 05.08.2026 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the applicants. Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Addl. A.G., for respondents. No. 1 and 3. Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, vice counsel for respondent No.2. The instant application has been filed for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. As per averments as made in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is neither intentional nor willful, but the same has occurred due to unavoidable circumstances. Learned counsel for the non-applicants have no objection in case the application is allowed. Consequently, in view of the averments as made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit and in view of submissions as made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present application is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. OMP No. 764 of 2026 The prayer made in the application is allowed. The applicants are permitted to re-file the appeal after removal of the office objections. The application stands disposed of. Arb. Appeal No. /2026 Be registered. Notice. Learned Additional Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 3 and Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate accepts the same on behalf of respondent No.2. List along with Arb. Appeal No. 407 of 2026 on 27.08.2026. In the meanwhile record be also requisitioned. (Romesh Verma) Judge 5th August, 2026 (kck)