MAHENDRA KUMAR S/O RAMLAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/16105/2025 · 2026-01-23
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20283 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20283 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3348] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16105/2025 Mahendra Kumar S/o Ramlal, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Loda- heda, Police Station Kanwas, District Kota (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Ramganjmandi). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 23/01/2026
1. The instant bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.196/2025 registered at Police Station Kanwas, District Kota Rural for the offences punishable under under Sections 126(2) & 115(2) of the BNS, 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the injuries sustained to injured person have been opined as simple in nature. Trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.11.2025 and there are no criminal antecedents against him. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application.
[2026:RJ-JP:3348] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16105/2025]
4. Heard. Perused the material available on record.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially considering the fact that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion and there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Mahendra Kumar S/o Ramlal shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /67