IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 12927 of 2026 Decided on: 18.08 .2026 Tilak Chand and others …….Petitioners Versus Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?2 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) CMP No. 210 90 of 2026 This application is allowed as prayed for and the documents appended therewith are ordered to be taken on record. CWP No. 12 9 27 of 2026 2. Notice. Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, learned Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, the petitioners shall be satisfied, in case, this petition is disposed of with the direction to the competent Authority to decide the representations filed by them, appended with the petition as Annexure P-2 (colly.), within some reasonable time. 4. Accordingly, without adjudication on the merit of the issue, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the 2 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? representations made by the petitioners, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-2 (colly.), shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 18 , 2026 (narender)