SOUMITRA BANERJEE v. ARUP KUMAR CHATTERJEE AND ORS
FAT/2466/2007 · 2026-05-15
Rai Chattopadhyay, Rajasekhar Mantha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20282 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20282 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
20.05.2026 Court No.13 Item No.1 pk F. A. No. 319 of 2007 (FAT 2466 of 2007)
Soumitra Banerjee Vs. Arup Kumar Chatterjee and others
Mr. Dilip Kumar Maity ...for the substituted respondent nos. 1(a) to 1(g).
1. The judgment dated 15.05.2026 is mentioned for correction.
2. In the 6th line of paragraph 4 of the second page of the said order, the expression “the father of” shall stand deleted.
3. In the second line of paragraph 6 of the third page of the said order, “1987” shall stand corrected and be read as “1997”.
4. Similarly in the second line of paragraph 8 of the third page of the said order, the expression “FA 53 of 1987” shall stand corrected and be read as “FA 53 of 1997”.
5. In the 6th line of paragraph 16 of page 6 of the said
order, the expression “Rule 41” shall stand corrected and be read as “Order 41”.
6. In the portion set out under paragraph 16 of page 6 of the said order, after the expression “Order 41”, “Rule” shall be inserted.
7. Registry of this Court shall record “F.A. No. 319 of 2007” against “FAT 2466 of 2007”.
2
8. The other parts of the said order shall remain unaltered.
9. Let the aforesaid corrections be incorporated in the
judgment dated 15.05.2026.
10. The Department is directed to make necessary corrections.
11. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order and duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)