Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20280 (HP)

DEV RAJ KAPTA v. PRAVEEN AND OTHERS

CMPMO/235/2026 · 2026-08-05

Romesh Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sanjay Mahajan vs. Vijender Kumar Arvind Jain a/w connected matter CMPMO No. 315 & 326/2026 05.08.2026 Present: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, vice counsel for the petitioner(s). Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate, for respondent No.1, in both petitions. CMPMO No. 315/2026 Respondent No.2 stands duly served, hence it is proceeded against ex parte. It is submitted by learned vice counsel for the petitioner(s) that the arguing counsel is unwell today. At his request, list on 10.08.2026. CMPMO No. 326/2026 Though steps have been taken for service of respondent No.2, however records reveal that notices have not been issued to it. Registry is directed to issue notice for the service of respondent No.2 returnable within three weeks from today. Learned vice counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply copy of entire paper book to the learned counsel for respondent No.1 during the course of the day. List after three weeks. (Romesh Verma) Judge 05.08.2026 (pankaj)