APHC010191552009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10717/2009 Between: 1. SMT. KORADA APPALA KONDA, W/O. AMMATHALI HOUSEWIFE R/O. D.NO.1-50/3, PURUSHOTHAMAPURAM, CHINNAMUSHIRWADA (POST), ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI VARAHA LAKSHMI NARASIMHA SWAMY DEVASTHANAM, Rep. by its Executive Officer Simhachalam, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the Respondent in demolishing the structures in the land to an extent of 256 Sq. Yards in Survey No.41 of Purushotamapuram Village, Pendurti Mandal belongs to the Petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Principles of natural justice and in violation of Article 21 and 300 (A) of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent not to interfere into the lands of the Petitioner to an extent of 256 Sq. Yards in Survey No.41 of Purushotamapuram Village, Pendurti Mandal. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP 13718 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent not to dispossess the Petitioner from her land to an extent 256 Sq. Yards in Survey No.41 of Purushotamapuram Village, Pendurti Mandal except due process of law, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T D PANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. K MADHAVA REDDY (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS AR) The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITON NO.10717 OF 2009 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.Michael, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 03.02.2026 BSP 50 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.10717 of 2009 03.02.2026 BSP